home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sowebo.charm.net!tekhed
- From: tekhed@charm.net (Randy Goldstein)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc
- Subject: Re: C++ with Zapp vs. Delphi
- Followup-To: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc
- Date: 5 Jan 1996 19:18:06 GMT
- Organization: Charm.Net : Baltimore Local Internet Access, Hon
- Message-ID: <4cjthe$23t@canton.charm.net>
- References: <4cfor8$qno@picasso.op.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sowebo.charm.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Bruce Momjian (root@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote:
- : Pascal is simpler, but C++ is more powerful/flexible.
-
- : Is this a fair comparison?
-
- According to the manuals, you can have assembler blocks in Delphi. To me
- this would make the "flexibility" limit no less than any other language.
- Correct me if I'm wrong.
-
-
- --
-
- \\\\
- 0 0
- \=/
- tekhed@charm.net
- http://charm.net/~tekhed
- ftp://charm.net/pub/home2/tekhed
-
-